Intergenerational dialogue – YOUthDIG Messages 2026
26 May 2026 | 16:30 - 17:15 CEST | Alcide De Gasperi | 
| 
Consolidated programme 2026
The increasing demand for young people to be recognised as stakeholders requires empowering youth in Internet Governance. This involves integrating younger topics, concerns, and perspectives that were previously underrepresented in such settings. To facilitate this inclusivity, a series of Intergenerational Dialogues brings together senior EuroDIG attendees, along with current YOUthDIG participants, providing an open and comprehensive platform to present youths' impressions on Internet Governance and discuss the Youth Messages.
Session description
This dialogue aims to bridge the gap between generations, fostering mutual understanding and collaborative efforts. During the session, youth participants (18-30 years of age) will reflect on the day's agenda and present the Youth Messages they have developed in the days leading up to EuroDIG. Senior experts in Internet-related policymaking and diplomacy will engage in a debate about these messages and provide their comments.
Format
During the first 15 minutes of the Intergenerational Dialogue, the YOUthDIG Organising Team will present the activities of YOUthDIG. During the following 30 minutes, members of the YOUthDIG cohort will engage in discussion with senior policymakers about their vision for the future of the Internet through the YOUthDIG agenda.
Further reading
People
Focal Point
- Nadia Tjahja, YOUthDIG Coordinator
Key Participants
First section
- Sabaeta Zeneli, Albania, YOUthDIG 2025
- Somaya Louhmadi, Luxembourg, YOUthDIG 2025
- Stephanie Teeuwen, The Netherlands, YOUthDIG 2021
- Francesco Vecchi, Italy, YOUthDIG 2024
Second section
- TBC, YOUthDIG 2026
- TBC, YOUthDIG 2026
- Fabrizia Benini, Head of the Future Internet Unit, DG Communications Networks, Content and Technology (DG CNECT)
- Sophie Kwasny, Head of Education, Training and Cooperation Division at Youth Department at Council of Europe
Moderator
- Frances Douglas-Thomson, EuroDIG Programme Committee, YOUthDIG 2025
Video record
Transcript
Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed.
Florence Ranson: So let’s pick up for our next session. Earlier today, already this morning in the opening, but in various sessions, we’ve had the opportunity to talk about the Youth Dig event that took place over the last couple of days, as well as talking about the contributions of our youth diggers, as they call themselves. And we’ve seen that there’s quite a large number of them. So now is their time. I gave earlier on for the opening plenary a very rough overview of the key outcomes of the Youth Dig event. But now we’re going to hear in more detail what was discussed there and what the outcome of the youth dialogue was. And to take us through this.
This particular. part and I think a very interesting part of the discussions this afternoon. I’d like to welcome Frances Douglas -Thompson. She’s part of the EuroDig program committee for YouthDig 2025, right? It was 2025, wasn’t it? So welcome, Frances.
Frances Douglas-Thompson: Hi, so yes, my name is Frances Douglas -Thompson. I’m on the EuroDig program committee this year, but I was on the YouthDig program last year. This is how I was introduced to EuroDig as a whole, and I’m very grateful for that experience. We’re going to be talking a bit about YouthDig, and then we’re going to go into an intergenerational dialogue. But before we get started, for anyone who doesn’t know, the YouthDig is the youth dialogue on internet governance, and it is a pre -event to EuroDig. And what it does is it fosters and facilitates youth governance on the internet. And it’s a pre -event to EuroDig. participation by drawing young people from all across the pan -European region who have a strong interest in internet governance and digital policy.
what happens is we bring these young people together they work together to advocate youth messages that they draft following intense discussion and debate and every year youth dig is organized by former youth diggers what this does is it provides continuity and each time we run or the youth organizers run youth dig the idea is that there is constantly improved and it also establishes a strong network of youth dig alumni and i hope that many of you have come to realize that even in this room we have a lot of youth dig alumni they tend to establish themselves very very well in the internet governance sphere with that i would like to begin by passing over to the organizers of this year’s youth dig please
Stephanie Teeuwen: thank you so much thank you so much francis for the for the introduction and for telling a little bit about youth dig so maybe just for everyone in the room we would like to tell you a little bit about what we’ve done the past weekend in order to prepare all these young new young people for entering the internet governance ecosystem so essentially before we came together in Brussels as the whole youth week of this year we already hosted a number of webinars in which we introduced new people to the internet governance ecosystem and where they heard from key internet governance institutions and so when we came together during the weekend we focused on a few different topics so on the first day the theme of the day was internet governance and artificial intelligence and so we really focused on sort of talking and discussing the ways in which AI is impacting the internet governance ecosystem and is impacting our digital lives and so we started the day with a session focused on the way in which AI impacts our experiences on the internet.
And then we also focused on online child safety. And we talked about the use of AI in public service. And it was very valuable to hear from a lot of the different participants from all over the pan -European region on their perspectives on AI in healthcare or AI and its environmental impact, and also the role of AI and how it impacts young people on schools. So overall, it has been very fruitful. And now
Somaya Louhmadi: Thank you very much. On the second day, the youth diggers, they covered the new threats that our democracies are living right now. They started with a session where they did crisis simulation, where they discovered cases of digital attacks that were not possible to detect. That our democracies were under, for example, from deep fakes to… from deepfakes to the elections being rigged by the AI. And then they were in a session for state surveillance and privacy, where they looked into the human rights approach of states surveilling, for example, phones or conversations of their citizens. Then they assisted to a session on internet shutdowns, where they first saw why internet shutdowns happened and then what was the consequences of these internet shutdowns.
Then they went into a session for cookies to learn what cookies are and how they work and how they’re impacting the use of the websites. They also assisted to two other sessions. One hosted… by Eurid the host of this year for EURODIG to learn more about it. And then last session on public speaking to be more comfortable at EURODIG to be able to present their messages and also to participate in the discussions, as you may have also already seen them participating earlier this day.
Sabaeta Zeneli: Thank you, Somaya As you heard from my colleagues, the program was really packed and intense for our youth figures, so we also tried to make the most of it. Stephanie mentioned that we have a pan -European cohort. Like every year, Yuridic brings participants from all over Europe and beyond. This year we had, just to mention a few, people coming from Ireland to Georgia, from Sweden to Kosovo, so it was really… wide representation in our cohort. And they also come from different backgrounds, academic backgrounds, as well as professional ones. So we tried to create and foster connections and bonds between them through also some social events. For example, everybody got to bring a piece of home and exchange national sweets with the others.
We organized a small scavenger hunt around Brussels so that they could see some main locations in the city, as well as several energizers and two social dinners where they also got to mention the incredible alumni network that Francis mentioned. And it was really important to see how youth thinkers remain in the ecosystem. It was mentioned before in the pre -session how one big battle that we are facing is brain drain and how to keep young people engaged. Well, we believe that Youthic is an example of a way to keep young people engaged. And we are also proud of that, trying to foster a… a pan -European community of young people that are interested and trying to open the door for them to join these discussions, to give their contribution, and why not create bonds that will go then beyond youthic and beyond juridic.
Yeah, I will leave the floor to Francesco.
Francesco Vecchi: Thank you, Sabaeta but in general I would say thank you to Sabaeta Somalia, Stefania, Joao and Nadia that are not on stage because this year they are the main organizer of the youth event and they managed to get not only 30 people on site but 400 applicants from all over Europe. And as Sabaeta was already saying, among these there are of course a lot of people from academia, students, but also young local politicians, some young civil servants and members of public authorities. And given the wide numbers of people coming from these backgrounds, it was decided to provide them a space where they could not only discuss about the topic, but it was really fostered, their knowledge of the institution.
and enhance their possible impact on the same. For this reason, and to provide another capacity -building opportunity for policymakers, it was created a Young Policymakers Track that took place yesterday, and it was organized in three main sessions. One on new digital governance, understanding who shapes the EU. We know it’s a quite complicated question to answer. Then a workshop that analyzed the EU digital policies, but in general analyzed the work of Internet society. And finally, a roundtable organized by your ID, focusing on what makes the Internet work and why does it matter. And with this, I leave the floor again to Francis.
Frances Douglas-Thompson: Brilliant. Because they do such an amazing job they facilitate so many young people learning about internet governance as and as they clearly pointed out this is how you get young people involved before they’ve decided maybe what path they want to take in life uh so it’s incredibly important so thank you so much um right now we’re going to move on to the intergenerational dialogue two members of this year’s youth dig will present the messages which they drafted through the process of youth dig uh just this week and gone what happens is they get together in groups uh they have just really serious debate and discussion uh about the topics that they’ve learned about over the weekend and then they draft these messages together that they deem important and relevant to share with stakeholders at euro dig today so after they present these messages we’re going to move uh to a discussion and we’re very very very happy to be uh joined by two very well -established members of the internet community governance community for this uh we’re so fortunate to be joined by Fabrizia Benini head of unit at the european commission dg connect e future internet please give her a round of applause as she comes on stage and also Sophie Kwasny head of the education training and cooperation division of the youth department at the Council of Europe please welcome her and for today’s discussion we’re joined by our YOUthDIG representatives who are Liana Vasil and Cecile Vicry please give them a round of applause.
So after this I’d like to start please Cecile and Liana please start us off by giving us a brief overview of the messages that you drafted.
Cecile Vicquery: good morning everyone so as it was said we gathered different messages through these days firstly we talked about data leaks and especially also surveillance which we think as young people is a very important thing is a particular issue nowadays And we want to leave the message that we should establish data ownership of our data and understand better who is managing this data and regulate it. Linked to that also is the aspect of data profiling. So we know that AI algorithms are trained nowadays to profile ourselves and the users. So we would like to ensure that this data are not trained to portray biases, especially for some categories of people such as women, young women, but also the LGBTQ plus communities.
And thirdly, we were thinking especially about young people entering the employment at this time with AI and the digital aspects. So we should ensure that people understand. And fourthly, we should ensure that people are not left behind, especially in the workplace, and that we can ensure a workplace that is safe and fair, especially when entering it.
Liana Vasil: the second theme that we covered was the digital impact on children where we all agree that children should actually learn digital literacy and about their agency and critical thinking skills before having access to generative ai and also that parents should be empowered to support their children’s cognitive development we also agreed that governments should invest more in mental health programs that would combat social media addiction or anxiety or cyber bullying and other negative effects another point that we touched on was that strengthening regulations that already exist such as the gdpr is also critical because we would like to see that the collection of data of children is limited as well as the tracking of a child’s behavior online and with that we would also add the removal of experiences and the removal of the data of children and children’s behavior online existing data And lastly, social media, we would like to see it being tailored to evolving capacities of children.
So that would mean that basically certain features would be restricted with age, but then they would be adopted once the children are growing up, but also to implement parental control for children under 16, as that would probably prevent a lot of negative effects as well, such as addictive designs.
Cecile Vicquery: Yes, and on this note, we talk also about accessibilities, especially for categories such as older people or also people with disabilities. So we should also reflect on how to include everyone, especially concerning digital literacy, but also, I mean, for example, intergenerational workshops. At the same time, we talk about rural areas. How can we ensure that internet is a human right if not everybody can access it even in rural areas? And as we were mentioning, like Europe is evolving and is adopting even more facilities that will have digital work. But as we think about building these facilities, we should think also about the environment because we should take into consideration also local communities when building these policies as they could have a big impact on water access and also on the land that we use.
And lastly, I’ll talk about the workforce that is included in the AI. So the people that are impacted, for example. The people working in extract resources, but also the people that moderate the content of AI. So we should also ensure that their rights are protected.
Liana Vasil: And lastly, we touched upon the theme of disinformation and freedom of expression online. We discussed how it is critical to ensure and maintain citizen safety and freedoms online and how for that we would like to see how international organizations put forward legislation on states’ ability to surveil their citizens as no international legislation exists so far. Also, on the long term, we decided that it would be ideal to see an agency that would be established, ideally an independent intergovernmental agency that would have the authority to regulate and supervise state surveillance issues. On another topic, we were thinking about AI and medical advice, and we realized that when requested medical advice, AI usually provides the sources only at the end of their answers.
So we decided that that is a problem that should be targeted by making AI chatbots. AI has clearly specified the sources at the beginning of their response. In this case, they would also… be able to differentiate between professional advice and anonymous commentary online. We also talked about algorithms that could be beneficial to the internet, for example, to detect social media harm speech or hateful comments before being posted, and how could that be possible to avoid censorship by making the algorithms signal that the hateful speech is going to be posted and then afterwards to be verified later and restricted if necessary. We also talked about the campaigns that were actually advertised before this session about the media literacy and disinformation projects that are supported by the EU, and we realized that they don’t have enough visibility, especially for the target audience, so we would like to see more social media advertisement on the projects that already exist.
And they’re dealing with fact -checking because they are so vital for the people who actually need them. And lastly, again, regarding AI and disinformation, we discussed how images and videos should ideally be labeled as such to prevent disinformation and to clearly differentiate between what are facts and what is AI generated online. And this would bring us to the end of our messages. Thank you.
Frances Douglas-Thompson: Thank you so much, Liana and Cecile. As you can probably tell, a lot of effort and time and energy goes into drafting these messages, and I think you’ve done a wonderful job. So I would like to begin by asking Fabrizio and Sophie what your immediate reactions are, and secondly, for example, are there any messages that might stand out to you? And then secondly, do you see any themes in your engagement with young people in terms of what tends to matter the most or is it always very varied?
Fabrizia Benny: First of all, I would like to thank everybody. I think that that’s the most extraordinary thing, is to listen to you. And I think we should be listening to you more than we do. not only in this framework, but also in the framework of developing policies at the EU level. I mean, we’re lucky enough that the president, Uzo van der Leyen, has instituted youth dialogues for every policy area in the union and that each member of the college does have dialogues with youth representatives on a yearly basis. So that is my strong suggestion, is that we should link this type of dialogue with those types of dialogues because we need your voices to be heard further than they are already heard.
Now, as to the exact messages, it is virtually impossible to go through all of them because you cover the entire spectrum of the digital transformation. What I find reassuring is that many of these messages, have been concerns of ours. It doesn’t mean we have solved them at the EU level, but it means that we have started a discussion towards identifying what is the best policy response, both in AI and both in international outreach. Because it’s all very well and good that we managed between 27 member states to pass laws that abide or help us into a human -centric digital transformation. The difficulty is, of course, to make sure that those principles and those rights which are enshrined in the Charter and indeed in the Declaration of Rights and Principles for the Digital Transformation has some influence and is actually followed elsewhere and hopefully at global level.
And in that regard, I think we’ve gone one step further. And we have targeted the implementation. We have targeted the empowerment of communities. And I think that is one way to go about it. There will be that approach of empowering communities that you will see in the tech sovereignty package coming up. and there is definitely one in AI policy. And we were comforted by the fact that in Weiss’s PLUS20 review that was concluded in December in New York, the multi -stakeholder model held. And why should we be celebrating just the fact that it held? Because there are a lot of pressures against it and there is a lot of bias that is spreading. There’s a lot of misinformation that is spreading.
There’s a lot of Internet shutdowns that are occurring. And your voices, because you are the people that we need to convince for the next steps, need to be strong enough. And so our job now is to make sure that we multiply its impact.
Frances Douglas-Thompson: Thanks a lot. That’s very clear. Sophie, over to you.
Sophie Kwasny: Bonjour, good afternoon everyone I’m very pleased to do the link between the Strasbourg second messages and the Brussels second messages because indeed as Thomas Schneider was recalling Strasbourg hosted twice already Brussels twice Eurodig and it’s a great pleasure and privilege for the Council of Europe to continue accompanying Eurodig so on the messages the first important thing is that on the youth DIC messages I should say it’s great that they exist it’s great that they are there as a strong reference congratulations for the hard work in delivering them and presenting them today so indeed you mentioned I’m here also on the legitimacy of the intergenerational discussion having been last actually in Eurodig 10 years ago so so I’m very happy to be back and thank you for this invitation What strikes me the most with the youth messages is how they demonstrate a very deep awareness of the power structures that are actually behind Internet, behind the AI ecosystem.
So you’re very concretely asking with those messages who governs technology, who benefits from it, who bears the cost, and who is left vulnerable. And there’s a strong focus on vulnerability. And several themes illustrate this. First, a very strong concern about surveillance, about data ownership. You record it and algorithmic governance. And you repeatedly call for ethical data governance and protection against profiling checks on state surveillance. If I may there, come to the legal standards that you were also recalling. Thank you. We have global standards that are applicable in that context. It’s key to remind them. It’s key to actually build on them and to ensure enforceability of those standards. So I can mention our cybercrime convention, but I can mention also our data protection convention.
So when you call for an independent agency looking into surveillance, please do use the standards that are there and that actually have to be enforced. You have grown up fully inside the platform economy and understand that the digital rights are not abstract legal principles. They shape everyday life. They shape employment. They shape education and democratic participation. You’ve heard before about the new democratic pact for Europe that the Council of Europe established. It’s working on. And clearly this contribution and how to respond to those challenges is also key. So clearly what is, I think, striking with those messages is that there is a mature understanding of the fact that we’re not dealing solely with technological issues, but the social issues behind them.
So you connect the problematics to labor rights, to discrimination, children’s well -being, accessibility, and very interestingly, you link disparity with the effect of the localization of the data centers and the environmental impact of that. So congrats. It’s really important that they’re also used in the global context. In the context of the Internet governance, we’ve heard about, you know, wanting to reaffirm open, global, accessible Internet and the role of Europe and your role as youth figure, and that is essential.
Frances Douglas-Thompson: thank you sophie and thank you for britsy as well those are very clear and useful messages um i would now like to move on actually to liana and cecile i wanted to ask how did you find this sort of collaboration behind drafting the messages because as we’ve said time and time again this is pan -european we all come from different backgrounds and that’s sort of the whole point of it right um and coming from different backgrounds usefully means that you have very different perspectives so i wanted to know was it hard to find a rough consensus which is what we look for um near the end of the drafting processes and are were there any large discrepancies or disagreements that you encountered and and where were they and why did you have them
Liana Vasil: well as you said we do come from very different backgrounds so of course we encountered a lot of differences when we started with the messages it was already based on something that we discussed before and we all agreed that it was a very different thing and we all agreed that it was important topics and then we wanted to narrow them down but this process was indeed difficult as we came from also different fields we had a different education so we also were able to think about different stakeholders. And I think the main issue was with the normative questions, because it is so hard to find an approach that everyone is agreeing with, as everyone is thinking about their own perspective and their own stakeholders.
But it was definitely a great exercise, because in this way, you also might realize why your own perspective would not be suitable for a certain approach. However, as you have seen, we managed to narrow them down to what we just said, but some of them still remain a little bit vague, because we just couldn’t find a best approach, and we decided that this would be the initial step to moving forward.
Cecile Vicquery: Yes, I think that we can say that, in my opinion, your dig was a bit multi -stakeholder approach in the small, because we gather, as I said, the messages in weeks, like this week, but also before. And for sure, there were times of difficulties to find a common ground, as you already said, between the technical aspect, but also the more legislative one. And for sure, one aspect that has to be continually improved is also finding solutions, because sometimes it’s easy to point to a problem, but finding the solution is more difficult.
Frances Douglas-Thompson: Thanks so much. Now back to Fabrizio and Sophie. Sophie, so Fabrizia, you’ve touched on this a bit, but why do you both think it’s so important to have youth -centred co -design of principles and policies, especially in policy and internet governance, digital policy and internet governance? And where do you think the energy and interest of youth voice is best directed? Or is that sort of a contradiction in terms? Are you looking for where maybe, you know, personal perspective comes in, the fact that they’re natives to this kind of technology? What is so valuable about youth? The perspectives comparing to other stakeholders in the multi -stakeholder model.
Fabrizia Benny: the development, but everybody from every continent and both sexes and, you know, every type of community needs to be there and they need to find their space because it is indeed a global common good. That baseline has not been reached yet because we have in many parts of the tech development and tech policy vast areas of the world that are simply not reflected in the models, be them AI models, be it the way surveillance is carried out, being the way it is enforced. Laws are enforced in some parts of the world with a specific bias, for instance, based on race and sex. So that is our first threshold. Our second threshold is to make sure that we think of the future as well.
The specificity. The specificity of youth dialogues are both because you tend to, as you rightly pointed out, you tend to be, in fact, very specific in your criticism. or, let’s say, in pointing out to a failure or a gap in whatever is happening. Because you are there, you are witnessing it as it develops live. And I would like to come back to my previous point, which is to link various youth initiatives. It needs to be something on our side, but also on your side, because you have the ability to know what’s happening in TikTok and what’s happening in other platforms and what’s happening in the very, let’s say, institutionalized way in which, for instance, the European Union communicates or the UN communicates and put that together and show us what is it that we are missing.
Why is it that we are not getting the message straight? Why is it that we are not reaching more people? This is a game of numbers. and really a game of numbers, if ever there was one. And so, therefore, if we are able to reach out to you and you are able to reach out to us, the influence will multiply. So I would say it’s not so much per theme, but per numbers.
Sophie Kwasny: Frances, you mentioned youth -centered co -design in your question, and so I’d like to come back to that, because it’s not about having those messages and youth participating, having a youth dig on. It’s about really this co -shaping of policies, and I think we’re in a multi -stakeholder format, so more than ever, this is essential. And you also referred to natives, and beyond natives, well, I would say beyond users. of the technologies and Internet because, okay, as we’ve said, you’ve been born, you’ve grown with them, with those technologies, tools, platforms, but you’re also developing them. You’re part of the ecosystem that develop those technologies. And so your awareness of the long -term impact of the technologies is key, and that is the social impact, the educational impact, economical and political impact.
To come back to the co -design, co -management, I would like to do a link with what the Council of Europe has been doing for decades, which is called the co -management. We’ve started solely in the youth sector and gradually have expanded it to what is called the youth perspective. That is that in all segments of the work of the Council of Europe, so our pillars are human rights, democracy, and the rule of law, we’re calling for youth perspective within the organization but also at our member states level. The co -management system is maybe the most elaborated model where there is parity in the decision making. So it would be great to see more of this actually in an internet governance environment.
But beyond that, the youth perspective, and congrats actually to the European dialogue because it’s exactly what it’s delivering, is ensuring that there is a meaningful participation of young people in the process and in the development of the policies. So… Once again, to congratulate actually the Secretariat and Eurodig for making this possible and looking forward to supporting you and Youthdig
Frances Douglas-Thompson: Thanks so much. Finally, then, we’re going to wrap up in a bit, but I’d like to maybe ask Cecile and Liana, if you could say one thing to the audience here. About the messages you’ve drafted, about the process you’ve gone into, about the learning you’ve had over the weekend in the Youthdig, what do you think the most important thing to convey? Like what matters to you most? What were you most inspired by? We’d love to hear.
Cecile Vicquery: I think for me, what I was more struck by was looking also at the gender -based aspect of AI and digital, because I think as young women, we are more and more expecting threats online, unfortunately. So I think that should be a big issue. And as we know, we are building up on the ban on AI apps that are notifying women or other categories. So this is an important step. And I think what I take also from this initiative is that we have all to be more aware about our data and what is being shared online, because we are in a world where unfortunately there is more and more surveillance and also other threats as data ownership, as already said.
Liana Vasil: I believe that for me, it was really eye opening these past days to be surrounded by people who are working in different fields or acting in different fields, because This makes you really aware that your own problem or the problem that you encounter in your field is not actually solely your own problem. And different stakeholders also encounter them and have other interests. And it always seems the best way just to collaborate because oftentimes the interests overlap. So I think dialogue is really at the basis, even though it might seem that dialogue doesn’t really lead to action. I think it’s the vital first step that everyone has to take to realize what each other’s interests are and how cooperation can be achieved for anything really that you want to progress with.
And also to really be aware of any new emerging technology, because it seems that it is running faster than we can see. And yes, to be always cautious of what is surrounding you and to not. Remain in your own bubble.
Frances Douglas-Thompson: thank you so much and then lastly let’s go to favorites here in sophie do you have any messages for the youth dig community uh maybe about engagement or how to stay in the sphere now they’ve been
Fabrizia Benny: uh yes i think that the message that i’d like to pass is you need to care about the rights you have and scream very loudly about the ones you don’t have it’s only if you care will somebody as policy makers do something about it and perhaps have it enforced it’s an it’s a numbers game your voice needs to be representative in rights and as regards principles you care about and that goes to privacy that goes to ai center development it goes to just about every surveillance if you do not shout clearly enough the likelihood of you not being heard will obviously increase. It looks as an evidence statement but never has this been so critical for you to take that stance.
And not only the people here but your multiplying online presence needs to be very strong. Okay?
Sophie Kwasny: Yes, exactly. Exactly. I think you have to be adamant, very strong, very blunt. And that was one of the points I made on enforcing the standards and the data protection, the right to privacy one. Use the mechanisms that are there. So we’re happy that in the youth delegation we have two advisory council representatives, Adam and Alessandro, that are actually my boss thanks to the co -management system. Because they decide like governments decide. And also, use mentoring to ensure a legacy and a continuity in your action, because it’s great that we have newcomers constantly, but what I really like, actually, it’s the link with the previous ones that have been involved, so that this really sustains a continuity in your action.
Frances Douglas-Thompson: Amazing. I would like to thank you all for such an enlightening conversation. Thank you so much for joining us. And please join me in giving a round of applause.