Cyborg – 2015: Difference between revisions
I.Franklin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
I.Franklin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Session description == | == Session description == | ||
The Cyborgs exist, they proliferate the social sphere and manifest their self trough intelligence explosion beyond our biological understanding. The proponents of the Singularity promise immortality whilst it's critiques are warning of the possible dangerous scenarios for our humanity. The proposed approach here is that we would create a Cyborg that uses its intelligence to learn what we value, and its motivation system is constructed in such a way that it is motivated to pursue our values or to perform actions that it predicts we would approve of in the future . | |||
Can we regulate our creativity? | Can we regulate our creativity? | ||
Revision as of 00:05, 27 May 2015
What is this session about?(1 sentence) Deadline 10.April 2015
Session description
The Cyborgs exist, they proliferate the social sphere and manifest their self trough intelligence explosion beyond our biological understanding. The proponents of the Singularity promise immortality whilst it's critiques are warning of the possible dangerous scenarios for our humanity. The proposed approach here is that we would create a Cyborg that uses its intelligence to learn what we value, and its motivation system is constructed in such a way that it is motivated to pursue our values or to perform actions that it predicts we would approve of in the future .
Can we regulate our creativity?
Perhaps, if we are not careful what we create and share on the web one day could become a living nightmare in reality.
Keywords
Deadline 10. April 2015
Further reading
Deadline 30. April 2015
People
Iliana Franklin
Session twitter hashtag
Hashtag: #eurodigf2